Sound familiar, well it should because the story is a combination of every superhero movie so far. There is nothing original about this story or the lead character. She is the typical female lead (less maybe the Avengers) of a superhero movie, it's just that in this case the heroes or Turtles so it doesn't become the 'love story' we are so used to (although Michelangelo does appear to have a thing for her). However, in feeling like they need a love interest they brought in the completely redundant Will Arnett, whose character attempts at humour and being the love interest fail epically.
Speaking of the Turtles themselves, could they be anymore boring. Michelangelo was by far the highlight of the whole film because he brought some much needed humour to the proceedings, the rest were tired, boring and predictable. There was no excitement like there used to be in the cartoon and even in the 90's movies. The CGI may have been better but I'd much rather sit through the 1990 version, at least that kept with the trend of the cartoon and made the turtles fun. Plus, is it just me or did the new CGI turtles (and Splinter for that matter) look a lot more gross that I remembered, I always knew they lived in a sewer but it never looked like they did until now. yak!
I'm really disappointed to say that although it kept my interest throughout it wasn't great, the story was dull and predictable as were the turtles.
Nice review Jenna :) I kinda enjoyed TMNT a little, but have to admit that the story was crap. I mean, Splinter just finds a ninjistu book in the sewer? Pretty convenient if you ask me! :)
ReplyDeleteVery good review Jenna. i agree with you the story was the same as always, it was boring and predictable. wasn't splinter, shredders arch nemesis rat? i didn't like megan fox, she played a very wooden part. the foot soldiers used to be ninjas and not mercenaries also why didn't they use swords instead of guns? i used to love the cartoon when it was out and i loved all three films from the 90s
ReplyDelete